After a score challenge, which statement about target evaluation is true?

After a score challenge, which statement about target evaluation is true?

• A. No person with an interest in the outcome may evaluate targets.
• B. An interested person may evaluate targets.
• C. The Chief Range Officer must evaluate all targets.
• D. Target evaluation is suspended.

Answer: (A)

The key idea is fairness through neutrality: after a score challenge, the people who review targets should have no stake in the outcome. That’s why the correct statement is that no person with an interest in the outcome may evaluate targets. If someone stands to gain or lose from the result, their judgment could be biased, which would undermine trust in the decision. The other options clash with this principle. Allowing an interested person to evaluate introduces potential bias. Requiring the Chief Range Officer to evaluate all targets isn’t about preventing bias and isn’t how the process is intended to work. Suspending target evaluation would stall resolution and isn’t correct for handling disputes.

The key idea is fairness through neutrality: after a score challenge, the people who review targets should have no stake in the outcome. That’s why the correct statement is that no person with an interest in the outcome may evaluate targets. If someone stands to gain or lose from the result, their judgment could be biased, which would undermine trust in the decision.

The other options clash with this principle. Allowing an interested person to evaluate introduces potential bias. Requiring the Chief Range Officer to evaluate all targets isn’t about preventing bias and isn’t how the process is intended to work. Suspending target evaluation would stall resolution and isn’t correct for handling disputes.